JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 18, 1997

A- de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Borja Gonzalez Marco Tulio·Respondent Tribunal Superior Monteria

✓
Topic · hard data
Acumulacion De Fallos De Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acumulacion De Fallos De Tutela Para Revision
  • Improcedencia por situación fáctica
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

La Corte consideró desacumular para su revisión los expedientes de tutela de los demandantes de la referencia.

Lo anterior, debido a que la Corporación consideró, que si bien la temática contenida en dichas tutelas es similar, la situación fáctica desarrollada en cada una de ellas no permite que sean falladas en una misma sentencia, motivo por el cual serán fallados por separado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. DESACUMULAR para su revisión, los expedientes de tutela T-134050, demandante Marco Tulio Borja González y T-134359, demandante Ana Lucía Martínez Giraldo, los cuales serán fallados por separado.
  2. Notifíquese, y cúmplase.
  3. HERNANDO HERRERA VERGARA
  4. Magistrado Ponente
  5. ALEJANDRO MARTÍNEZ CABALLERO
  6. Magistrado
  7. FABIO MORÓN DÍAZ
  8. Magistrado
  9. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.